“PLAYFULNESS” NOT ENDS WITH END OF “ADOLESCENCE”

“PLAYFULNESS”  NOT ENDS WITH END OF “ADOLESCENCE”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Adolescence period is for about 5 to 6 for human beings, for girls it ends at 16 & for boys it ends at 18, so adolescence starts for girls at 10 or 11 year of the age & ends at 16, for boys it begins at 12 or 13 & ends at 18.

So “16” is given so much of importance for girls in Indian myth.

But “childlikeness & playfulness” does not go with end of adolescence period; it remains even after end of adolescence, depending upon one’s nature & mental construction.

Playfulness can well remain in old age even, it’s a good sign & a very good behavioral pattern.

And one at childhood age & adolescence time can be abnormally serious & quiet like an old age person.

So it is an individual nature, dependent on person to person.

Any living being’s general nature is playfulness, not only that, also playfulness is must, it is absolutely necessary for a person of any age, yes at childhood this playfulness is more evident, there is more playing around, in groups it (playfulness) takes another form, that is in groups playfulness teaches us how to interact, how to live & act together.

Playfulness also takes another form with age, that is knowledge seeking, measured behavior & watchful steps are also part of the playfulness, which we learn right from playfulness & childhood curiosity.

So always be playful & encourage playfulness for a healthy life.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 08/05/10, Written 05/11/11

(This is from my own experience & observation)

THE WINNER RACES IN HISTORY

THE  WINNER RACES  IN  HISTORY

---------------------------------------------------------------------.

This is my Thesis about the winners of history, as I deeply analyzed that, even if many races are far more advanced in civilization than others, they lost & succumbed to the inferiors races. I have come to this theory by analyzing Great Vedic & Egyptian civilizations, which succumbed many times over the period to other inferior civilizations & races in history.

WHY ?

The Analysis :

Kazakhstan (middle east) to Taklamakan to Xiahoe (West China), people were connected & were having almost same culture 3000 years ago, recent excavation of Taklamakan proves it. They were mainly “nomadic horsemen”, also reared small animals, did shifting & minor agriculture & were highly migratory, due to very hostile & deadly terrains.

That is, by analyzing series of rulers from Turks to Mongols to Tughlaks to Mughals to Hoons(Huns) to Tatars to Sakas, all of these were invader tribes & races & won lands after lands, civilization after civilization, which were far superior, subjugated these superior civilizations, ravaged them & settled there, BECAUSE they had  CARRIER ANIMALS, like horses, camels, donkeys.

Those races who had above carrier animals were either warriors or traders.

Horsemen, capable of using horse were warriors & other animal users (camels & donkeys) were generally traders.

HORSE WAS IN TOP.

Horsemen won the world.

Vedic civilization failed as reared cattle (cows, buffaloes, goats) only for food, milk & agriculture.

Also camels, donkeys, horses not necessarily need a cart for being used as self sufficient for uncarted use, but cows, buffaloes, bulls must need a cart, so the races using them while providing them with a great civilizations, but mainly for food, milk & agricultural cultivation use, these animals were capable of, but severely made them handicap to move, launch attack & win territories, also made them defenseless, i.e. unable to defend when horsemen came marauding on them, not only that, this made them poor traders & travelers, many will contradict by saying Vedic & Egyptian civilizations’ people were great traders & travelers, but actually neither they were great traders or travelers, barring a few ship voyages they went on, but that too when ship voyages began at much later stage in history.

Hence superior civilizations like Vedic & Egyptian kept losing to inferior & even to barbaric horse user tribesmen, there are many many examples of this throughout the world, right from Europe (Attila the Hoon) to Asia (Chengis Khan).

Therefore this thesis makes a radical difference in interpretation of history, along with a RADICAL difference of “mentalities of horse, camel and donkey USERS to the CATTLE REARS”, so it can be emphatically said type of animal use by a race set a “MENTALITY change & change in the COURSE of history”.

So, we can come to say type of animal use has a GREAT  IMPACT on the human civilization, so far not discussed in this perspective.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 2/7/10, Written 6/10/11

(My theories & concepts

 I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same)

Subhro Das, India

WHY THE EARTH IS NOT UNIFORM & EXPLANATION OF DESERTS

WHY THE EARTH IS NOT UNIFORM & EXPLANATION OF DESERTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

As scientists say & it is an established concept that the Earth has formed from a molten state, then structure of the Earth should be geographically absolutely uniform, but actually the Earth is so diverse, at some places iron ores, at some other places gold mines, rocks, hills, deep seas, planes & deserts so on. Why?

And most astonishing is presence of DESERTS, that is, how after all deserts are there?

From where these have come?

THE UN-UNIFORMITY.

As I have tried to explain this un-uniformity & presence of deserts, I have come up with this theory, the origin of deserts lies in the reason that because of great quakes that took place when the molten Earth cooled down somewhat, that is, much after the formation of the Earth & its round shape came about, BIG QUAKES began to take place, so big were they, that is even unimaginable now, as the situation was apt for such BIG upheavals & quakes, as earth crust was still that hot, which (those quakes) ultimately destroyed the geological uniformity of the Earth & brought about the un-uniformity that we see today, that is at someplace rocky, someplace hilly, someplace plane, someplace gorgy, someplace some ore, some place the other.

BUT.

But biggest RIDDLE is from where the DESETS have come?

Actually the deserts were sea beds, where billions of tons sands were deposited by the nature’s deluge of water, streaming down due to “incessant rain” which was going on for millions years, but those seas were heaved up by huge quakes as it has been described above, so their sand beds we see as our today’s deserts.

AMAZING.

Amazingly, this bring us to the fact that, there were clearly two major parts, so far untold of (apart from eras or periods, as we know) in the Earth’s LIFE.

The one we see today with our present seas & deserts & the other that was left behind, probably 2 to 3 billions years ago, with those seas now absent & NO DESERTS.

THEN WHY DESERTS ARE NOT THAT SALINE?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Simple reason for this, there are two in fact, one, as seas of billions years ago did not turn yet as saline as today’s, as naturally it took billions of years to reach this salinity of today, second is, it was not evaporation that erased the past seas, but upheavals & upheavals cause water to rush to lower lands, that is today’s seas.

 (Note: I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them)

Subhro Das

Written 31/8/11

Ashram Road, At, Po: ARARIA, BIHAR, INDIA

PIN 854311

WHY & HOW CANCER SPREADS? MY ANALYSIS

   

My theories & concepts

 I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same

Subhro Das, India

As follows :-  (I sent it to others & blogged it approx two months back)

WHY & HOW CANCER SPREADS? MY ANALYSIS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Why & how cancer spreads is still a mystery, still there has not been any scientific or reliable explanation for this.

As cancer should be localized to place in the body, if someone’s body develops cancer in an organ, be it at any part i.e. bone marrow, lymph gland, abdomen, bone or in a part of the brain, the cancer must remain localized to that part & grow there as big as possible, but should not get spread to other parts of the body or the other part of the same organ.

Deformity of a cell (any particular cell of any particular organ) due to genetic defect is cancer. DNA structure of a cell suddenly changes (by chance or by some external influence like radiation or toxic chemical), that is, a gene becomes defective and a result of that produces a deformed cell, may be “the change” is, that is, “deformed cell” is malignant in nature (origin of cancer) or the change is benign, that is, deformed cell does develop, but does not cause cancer.

Here I like to add that, a protein named P53, discovered 30 years ago plays a role in checking development & spread of cancer, scientists did not have an idea actually it plays such vital role in cancer, but now it is an accepted fact, it (P53) plays a pivotal role in almost all cancers, as cancer arises as “DNA errors” build up in cells, P53 corrects the errors & prevents cancerous mutations from spreading, it acts like a guardian genome, organizes repairs to the damaged cells & those cells beyond repair, it triggers a mechanism to kill them off, so that malignant cancerous cells die before replicating, but sometimes P53 fails or P53 itself gets damaged so tumors(lump of deformed cells, either malignant or benign) develop.

Now back to the analysis, when deformity of a cell occurs due to genetic defect as DNA structure suddenly changes abnormally (an abnormal change in DNA structure) & produces a defective cell, the cell replicates, that is, the defective cell multiplies (a natural tendency of all cells) & gives rise to a tumor (a lump of bad cells) or a malignant dead cells’ wound. But, my analysis is, the unchecked growth should be localized in an area only, should not spread to other parts of the body, which is the “local deformity” should not jump over to other parts. But, jumps. Why ?

Why gradually all parts of the body gets affected, why cancer spreads to other parts of the body?  That is, other organs start to have cancerous cells.

Simple answer will be cancer is carried to other parts by blood or any other fluid circulations as hormonal circulations. Then cancer is contagious? But cancer is not at all CONTAGIOUS & neither cancer has a vector bacteria or virus. If so, then blood of a person with cancer should also have a contagion effect? But, has none.

Then?

My theory is such a cancerous “genetic defect” is all  PERVASIVE (mind the words “genetic defect is all pervasive”), that is when such genetic defect begins to occur in the DNA of a person, it occurs off & on, randomly & regularly i.e. probability of such “defect occurrence” in every part of the body is highly increased, that is defect occurrence “the cancer” may seem local i.e. more pronounced at a place, but actually the whole body has been tuned up(defaulted) suddenly for such defect occurrences, in a particular part its manifestation(i.e. manifestation of such genetic defect) is violent, becomes berserk & cancerous lump comes up & at other parts may not be that pronounced, but all cells in the body are equally prone to genetic defects, once such defect process sets in, that is, the whole body cells become geared to produce genetically defective cells.

That is, the process of “defect occurrence” if once sets in the body, then it means “defect occurrence tendency” in the genes (in every gene, in every organ & every part of the body, may be some parts or some tissues are less susceptible, so lesser chances of “defect occurrences, i.e. lesser chances of developing a cancer ) has set in, may be once in a week in any particular cell or may once in a month or once in a year or at any time frequency, such defect occurrences will occur.

“Occurrence probability time” is also individualistic & type of “genetic defect occurrence” is also individual dependent, that is, it may differ widely case to case & person to person.

“Therefore it becomes plausible, by this theory, how & why cancer spreads to other parts of the body” to explain.

Example : Refer HT 05/08/10, she(Name held) already had undergone a surgery for breast cancer in 2007, but in 2010 doctors told cancer has spread to her brain & suggested her “Gamma Knife” surgery.

Subhro Das

Theorized by Subhro Das 09/08/10, Written 03/07/11(3rdJuly’11)

   

(My theories & concepts

 I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same

Subhro Das, India)

GROUP LIVING OF MAN: A COMPULSION

GROUP LIVING OF MAN: A COMPULSION

-------------------------------------------------------------.

Man lived with men in hoards in jungle(before civilization) unlike other animal groups, where alpha male drives away other males from the group, even kills the male child & only keeps hoards of females, but man due to compulsion has to keep up with other men in groups.

Reasons are, women are weak as per jungle criteria, not fit for hunting, bear children that immobilize them very much, breast feed the child, at periodical days in constraints, weight of bosoms hinder them & one man is incapable of hunting, so a group of men is needed to fell an animal for food, a man can’t feed a hoard women & their children(here promotion for nature’s cross breeding may not be a factor, as I analyzed a pack of lion family, also deer families).

Above all from beginning human were very hostile to other human groups, resorted to merciless butchering, once groups headed off each other, so for safety sake also, the compulsion of man had been to live with other men in a group.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 10/04/11

Written 01/06/11